>From my tests, I don't have such a drop in performances (max 2%). I also don't notice degradation on POST particularly. I agree with Sebb, issue are in 2.5 and 2.5.1 so we won't degrade things in a future 2.5.2.
Regards Philippe On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 5:27 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4 December 2011 16:09, Rainer Jung <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 01.12.2011 22:57, Philippe Mouawad wrote: > >> > >> Hello Sebb, > >> Don't you think we could make a release ? > >> > >> Lots of important fixes have been made and 2 months have passed since > last > >> release. > > > > > > First of all congrats to the huge progress you are making. > > > > What about BZ52189: "JMeter 2.5.1 slower than 2.4 for HTTP POST requests" > > > > Is that problem reproducible and really in the range described in the > first > > comment, or was that due to comparing different http samplers? > > Not sure; I've not been able to reproduce it yet, and the data so far > does not give much clue as to what is happening. > > > A drop in throughput from 130 to 80 just because of a newer version > would be > > pretty serious IMHO. Unfortunately I didn't yet have the cycles to try it > > myself, but wanted to provide a heads up. > > Agreed; however if the problem is difficult to solve I see no harm in > releasing another version so long as it is no worse than 2.5.1, and so > long as the problem is eventually resolved. > > > Regards, > > > > Rainer > > > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad.
