On 24.05.2012 22:10, Milamber wrote:
[ X] +1 I support this release [ ] +0 I am OK with this release [ ] -0 OK, but.... [ ] -1 I do not support this release (please indicate why)
+1 for release, thanks for RM! All minor packaging regressions I observed in RC1 are fixed. Details: - MD5 OK - signatures OK - key in KEYS file - AFAIK the key is still not in the web of trust. - gz and zip for src and bin consistent - src consistent with svn tag, except for expected differences - builds fine - build result looks consistent with distribution, except for - timestamps in generated javadoc (expected) - binary jar files (expected) - no Javadoc warnings - ran the tests (but only with java.awt.headless) - I have not checked the staging repository. Build and tests were done using Java 1.5.0_22, OS was Solaris 10 Sparc, Regards, Rainer
