PS: mibble up to version 2.3 is actually GPL with linking exception (in their own terms "essentially LGPL") ... maybe this helps if there is no suitable alternative.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Immanuel Hayden <immanuel.hay...@gmail.com> wrote: > GPL is a problem obviously, as it requires that even the project you > use it in (no matter how) is GPL-compatible. > LGPL does not have this restriction, so as long as we only link > against the library and don't include modified sources (which is I > think what the linked article refers to), we should be dandy ;) > > anyhow, if there are Apache-license equivalents it would obviously be > better (maybe the authors can be persuaded to do some dual licensing?) > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Milamber <milam...@apache.org> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Sorry, GPL or LGPL products cannot be included in a Apache Licence product >> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x >> >> Milamber >> >> Le 22/08/2012 03:33, Anthony Johnson a ecrit : >>> >>> Hey Guys, >>> My current company developed a SNMP Sampler w/RRD Graph Listener >>> for JMeter and I am working to get permission to contribute this code. >>> I'm a bit worried about licenses as we depend on 3 libraries: >>> >>> SNMP4J - Apache:-) >>> Mibble - GPL >>> JRobin - LGPL >>> >>> Thoughts?!? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Anthony >>> >>
