On 27 July 2013 13:20, Philippe Mouawad <[email protected]> wrote:
> There is no difference, that's why it would be nice to use Http Sampler.
There must be something about the current sampler GUI that is not
suitable, otherwise surely there would be no need to change anything?
I don't undertstand what you are proposing.
I don't want the full details of code changes at this point, just some
idea of what might need to be changed.
> See current code for generation of stream, I would need at some step to do
> this :
>
> writer.writeMessage(message, outputStream that I would get from HTTPClient);
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> import java.io.IOException;
> import java.util.HashMap;
> import java.util.LinkedHashMap;
> import java.util.Map;
>
> import org.apache.james.mime4j.MimeException;
> import org.apache.james.mime4j.dom.Header;
> import org.apache.james.mime4j.dom.MessageWriter;
> import org.apache.james.mime4j.dom.Multipart;
> import org.apache.james.mime4j.dom.TextBody;
> import org.apache.james.mime4j.field.DefaultFieldParser;
> import org.apache.james.mime4j.message.BodyPart;
> import org.apache.james.mime4j.message.DefaultMessageWriter;
> import org.apache.james.mime4j.message.HeaderImpl;
> import org.apache.james.mime4j.message.MessageImpl;
> import org.apache.james.mime4j.message.MultipartImpl;
> import org.apache.james.mime4j.storage.StorageBodyFactory;
>
> public class TestMime4j {
>
> public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException,
> MimeException {
> MessageImpl message = new MessageImpl();
>
> // Date and From are required fields
>
> // Message-ID should be present
> //message.createMessageId("machine.example");
>
> Multipart multipart = new MultipartImpl("related");
>
> // first part is text/plain
> StorageBodyFactory bodyFactory = new StorageBodyFactory();
> BodyPart textPart = createTextPart(bodyFactory, "<soap:Envelope
> xmlns:soap=\"http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/\";></soap:Envelope>");
> multipart.addBodyPart(textPart);
>
> // setMultipart also sets the Content-Type header field
>
> Map<String, String> map = new LinkedHashMap<String, String>();
> map.put("type", "text/xml");
> map.put("start", "<[email protected]>");
> map.put("start-info", "text/xml");
> message.setMultipart(multipart, map);
>
> //message.setBody(mul, "application/xop+xml", map);
> // header.addField(
> DefaultFieldParser.parse("type=application/xop+xml"));
> // message.setHeader(header);
> // 4) print message to standard output
>
> MessageWriter writer = new DefaultMessageWriter();
> writer.writeMessage(message, System.out);
>
> // 5) message is no longer needed and should be disposed of
>
> message.dispose();
> }
>
> /**
> * Creates a text part from the specified string.
> * @throws MimeException
> */
> private static BodyPart createTextPart(StorageBodyFactory bodyFactory,
> String text) throws MimeException {
> // Use UTF-8 to encode the specified text
> TextBody body = bodyFactory.textBody(text, "UTF-8");
> Header header = new HeaderImpl();
> header.addField(
> DefaultFieldParser.parse("Content-ID: <
> [email protected]>"));
> // Create a text/plain body part
> BodyPart bodyPart = new BodyPart();
> bodyPart.setHeader(header);
> Map<String, String> map = new HashMap<String, String>();
> map.put("type", "text/xml");
> map.put("charset", "UTF-8");
>
> bodyPart.setBody(body, "application/xop+xml", map);
> bodyPart.setContentTransferEncoding("8bit");
>
> return bodyPart;
> }
> }
>
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 2:13 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 27 July 2013 13:02, Philippe Mouawad <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> > I have started implementing Soap With Attachment (MTOM+XOP) and I was
>> > wondering what's the best option for GUI.
>> >
>> > 1) Use HttpSampler. The problem is that it is already very rich and I
>> don't
>> > know how user could tell he want's SOAP with Attachment.
>> >
>> > 2) Create a new GUI but it would be very close from Http Sampler one and
>> I
>> > don't want to duplicate code
>> >
>> > What's your opinions ?
>>
>> What are the differences from standard HTTP?
>>
>> > Regards
>> > Philippe
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.
