ok for me On Thursday, September 12, 2013, sebb wrote:
> Would everyone be happy with the following? > > HTTP(S) Test Script Recorder > > On 11 September 2013 12:58, Philippe Mouawad <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hello, > > Web seems ambiguous to me > > > > For example, websocket is/will be web but Proxy cannot record it. > > How about: > > HTTP(S) Scenario Recorder or HTTP(S) Test Script Recorder. > > > > > > Regards > > Philippe > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Milamber <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >> Le 11/09/2013 10:42, sebb a ecrit : > >> > >> On 11 September 2013 09:28, Milamber <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> I've prefer keep the word "proxy" in the name. > >>>> > >>> That's the part I really want to get rid of, because of the potential > >>> confusion with the other proxy settings. > >>> > >> Ok. > >> (The word "proxy" means in my mind: "you must configure your browser to > >> use this (JMeter) proxy to record your script".) > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>> "Test" is an ambiguous word, means in my mind "test" (like beta-test). > >>>> Word > >>>> like "script" seems better. > >>>> > >>> Well, we use Test already quite a lot, as in Test Element / Test > Script. > >>> > >>> Since JMeter is all about testing, I think using Test is OK. > >>> > >>> - HTTP(S) Proxy Recorder > >>>> - HTTP(S) Proxy Test Recorder > >>>> - Web Proxy Recorder > >>>> - Web Proxy for Test Recorder > >>>> - Web Proxy for Script Recorder > >>>> - Web Proxy Script Recorder > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Web Proxy Recorder is my favorite. > >>>> > >>>> How about > >>> > >>> Web Test Script Recorder > >>> > >> > >> +1 to this. > >> > >> > >> > >> or > >>> Test Script Recorder - HTTP(S) > >>> or > >>> HTTP(S) Test Script Recorder > >>> > >>> Le 11/09/2013 09:00, Philippe Mouawad a ecrit : > >>>> > >>>> HTTP(S) Test Recorder would be a good name I think. > >>>>> But if we do the change we absolutely need to keep all references to > >>>>> JMeter > >>>>> Proxy Server as it is referenced on many links and documentations. > >>>>> > >>>>> Did you have some time to think about summariser enabling ? > >>>>> > >>>>> Great changes you made sebb ! > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tuesday, September 10, 2013, sebb wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> The HTTP Proxy Server test element is used to record browser > sessions > >>>>>> as test plans. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The name does not describe its function (it describes the > >>>>>> implementation). > >>>>>> Having Proxy in the name means it's more easily confused with the > >>>>>> proxy settings that may be needed to run tests. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I wonder if it would be a good idea to rename the test element to > >>>>>> something like > >>>>>> > >>>>>> HTTP(S) Test Recorder > >>>>>> or > >>>>>> Test Recorder - HTTP(S) > >>>>>> or > >>>>>> Test Recorder - HTTP/HTTPS > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I did consider "Test Recorder" on its own, but that might be taken > to > >>>>>> imply that it can record other test types (e.g. JDBC), which it > cannot > >>>>>> at present. Even if we did implement JDBC recording, it would likely > >>>>>> need a different GUI as the options would be completely different, > so > >>>>>> I think the name needs to include HTTP(S). > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I think the rename will only affect the component reference docs - > and > >>>>>> -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad.
