On 6 January 2015 at 15:20, Felix Schumacher <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 28.12.2014 um 04:00 schrieb sebb: > >> On 24 December 2014 at 13:08, Felix Schumacher >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> in Workbench there is a constructor Workbench(String, boolean), which >>> seems >>> not to be used anywhere and it ignores the second parameter. >>> >>> Should we mark that constructor as deprecated? >> >> I don't think we need to retain binary compatibility for the WorkBench >> class, so we could just drop the ctor. > > Created a bugzilla entry 57418 and again the question: Where should I put > the change in changes.xml? Incompatible?
Not incompatible, non-functional > Regards > Felix >> >> >>> Regards >>> Felix > >
