Am 1. Juli 2015 22:29:59 MESZ, schrieb Philippe Mouawad <[email protected]>: >Hello, >I confirm that in the 3 samplers: >log.warn(""+Parameters.getClass()); >log.warn(""+args.getClass()); > >Will show: >2015/07/01 16:48:36 WARN - jmeter.util.BeanShellTestElement: class >java.lang.String >2015/07/01 16:48:36 WARN - jmeter.util.BeanShellTestElement: class >[Ljava.lang.String; >2015/07/01 16:48:36 WARN - jmeter.protocol.java.sampler.BSFSampler: >class >java.lang.String >2015/07/01 16:48:36 WARN - jmeter.protocol.java.sampler.BSFSampler: >class >[Ljava.lang.String; >2015/07/01 16:48:36 WARN - jmeter.protocol.java.sampler.JSR223Sampler: >class java.lang.String >2015/07/01 16:48:36 WARN - jmeter.protocol.java.sampler.JSR223Sampler: >class [Ljava.lang.String; > > >But I think this field name is not clear and should be improved. >Maybe something like: > > - parameters : Passed under 2 names Parameters (of type String) and > args (of type String[])
I thought the same. The name should be args without the brackets. > >Also by the way as JSR223 is the advised Test element maybe we should >move >BSF documentation to JSR223 and point BSF to JSR223. Probably a good idea, too. > >@Felix, my answer below. > >REgards > > >On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Felix Schumacher < >[email protected]> wrote: > >> Am 01.07.2015 um 08:31 schrieb Philippe Mouawad: >> >>> On Wednesday, July 1, 2015, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On 30 June 2015 at 20:16, Philippe Mouawad ><[email protected] >>>> <javascript:;>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> In the elements I mentionned above, the field parameters is >documented >>>>> >>>> as: >>>> >>>>> - Parameters to be passed to script (=> String Parameters and >String >>>>> >>>> []args) >>>> >>>>> I don't understand what is meant by: >>>>> -=> String Parameters and String []args >>>>> >>>> This is explained under "Parameters" here: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >http://jmeter.apache.org/usermanual/component_reference.html#BeanShell_Sampler >>>> >>> >>> Maybe it's the case for Beanshell but is it really the case for >JSR223 and >>> BSF ? >>> >>> I tried passing a String separated by spaces and no array is passed, >just >>> a >>> String >>> >> In JSR223TestElement in populateBindings() there is a binding to >args, >> which is filled with a splitted version of Parameters. So it should >work. >> >> Another thing I noticed are the documented bindings for BSF Listener >> (which are probably the same for the other BSF/JSR223-TestElement >based >> ones). The bindings "sampleResult" and "sampleEvent" are documented, >but I >> don't see them populated in populateBindings(). >> >> Are they really bound? >> >Yes in sampleOccured Will have a look again and format the two variables in the docs accordingly. Felix > >> >> Regards, >> Felix >> >> As Parameters is of type String , so what does String[] args mean in >this >>>>> context ? >>>>> >>>>> I find it very confusing. >>>>> >>>>> Unless there is a reason I am going to change it to: >>>>> >>>>> Parameters to be passed to script (=> Field is of type >java.lang.String) >>>>> >>>> No, see above. >>>> >>>> Furthermore in JSR223TestElement , I will modify those: >>>>> cacheKey_group.displayName=Script compilation caching (Mandatory >for >>>>> performances) >>>>> >>>> s/performances/performance/ >>>> >>>> cacheKey.shortDescription=This key should always be configured. If >Cache >>>>> key is not empty, script will be compiled if JSR223 underlying >script >>>>> language supports it and CompiledScript will be cached, ensure >script >>>>> >>>> does >>>> >>>>> not use any variable before making it cacheable. It is critical to >>>>> configure this key to obtain the best performances. >>>>> >>>>> s/performances/performance/ >>>> >>>> -- >>>>> Cordialement. >>>>> Philippe . >>>>> >>>> >>> >>
