On 4 January 2016 at 18:23, Philippe Mouawad <[email protected]> wrote: > First Happy new year 2016 ! > > > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 4:26 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > >> JMeter does not have a formal policy for major/minor version release >> updates. >> However historically major veresion changes have been associated with >> major changes. >> > > I am proposing to follow what seems to become a standard in versioning > refering to a proposal from a scientist working on the subject.
http://semver.org/ says: Increment the MAJOR version when you make incompatible API changes, We are not doing that. > >> Also other ASF projects such as Commons and HttpClient require major >> version bumps when removing deprecated code. >> > So isn't this what we are doing as we dropped 4 classes corresponding to > deprecated elements. And we will deprecate some more. > But the main idea behind this is that next version contains major features > which I think deserve this change. What features are you referring to? > > >> I don't think the proposed changes warrant a major version bump. >> > > I don't understand, but if we don't come to an agreement I propose to run a > vote on this although it would be better to avoid it. > >> >> On 3 January 2016 at 15:36, Milamber <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > I agree with a new release with a new version number system, and with the >> > next release to become 3.0. >> > >> > Before the next release, I would like add the HiDPI (high definition >> screen) >> > for JMeter (for Linux Gnome/GTK and Windows). Currently I works on this. >> > (my new computer have a 3200x1800 resolution on a 13' screen, JMeter is >> very >> > small with the CrossPlatform Swing UI) >> > >> > >> > >> > On 03/01/2016 15:08, Philippe Mouawad wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi Felix, >> >> Thanks for answer. >> >> I don't think it will be a long hold on the new release, for me we have >> >> these remaining points: >> >> >> >> - Integrate HTTPCLIENT 4.5.2 to fix >> >> - 58583 <https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58583> >> >> - 57319 >> >> - Finalize tests >> >> - 57804 => Waiting confirmation from Rainer or any other member of >> the >> >> team >> >> - Deprecation: >> >> - 58791 => I will do it >> >> - Not mandatory but would be nice: >> >> - 58793 >> >> - 58790 >> >> - 58792 => I will try to stat it >> >> - 58794 => I will start a discussion on this >> >> >> >> >> >> That's all for me, but if you see other things feel free to add it. >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> >> >> Philippe M. >> >> >> >> @philmdot >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Felix Schumacher < >> >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Am 01.01.2016 um 19:14 schrieb Philippe Mouawad: >> >>> >> >>>> Hi, >> >>>> Happy new year to the whole team. >> >>>> >> >>>> Any news on this ? >> >>>> >> >>> I have nothing against a 3.0, but I would not like it, if the "big" >> >>> version change would lead to a long hold up of a new release. >> >>> >> >>> Regards, >> >>> Felix >> >>> >> >>> Thanks >> >>>> >> >>>> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Philippe Mouawad < >> >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> Hi, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Following my proposals to deprecate a certain number of elements that >> >>>>> were >> >>>>> approved by 2 commiters and knowing that we have some important new >> >>>>> features in this release, I propose to name next version 3.0 instead >> of >> >>>>> 2.14. >> >>>>> It would be the occasion to make a big cleanup in all "oldies" >> elements >> >>>>> and maybe be even more aggressive in the deprecations/removals. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> And starting from there change our release naming to follow this: >> >>>>> - http://semver.org/ >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> This has been mentioned by this thread and I think it's a good idea: >> >>>>> - >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jmeter-dev/201411.mbox/%3CCAFJ7uesG%2BsKiQh_wQ5_iLp%3DJ%2BtSiG5fQ%3D7Pp1CvbJ1kncXo%2B%3Dg%40mail.gmail.com%3E >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I think in the developers thinking our current naming is not great, >> >>>>> cause >> >>>>> one can think every "major" release we do is a Minor release. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> -- >> >>>>> Regards >> >>>>> Philippe M. >> >>>>> @philmdot >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >> >> > >> > > > > -- > Cordialement. > Philippe Mouawad.
