Let me know your Github ID and I’ll get you added.

> On 4 Mar 2016, at 19:49, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> @Mark,
> A short term option would be to invite those who wants from JMeter team to
> have admin rights on the github repository so that your project has a
> bigger community.
> 
> I personally would be interested, I do not promise to be an important
> contributor but I'll do my best.
> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> On Friday, March 4, 2016, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Friday, March 4, 2016, sebb <seb...@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','seb...@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 4 March 2016 at 10:38, Mark Collin <mark.col...@lazeryattack.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> If the JMeter devs want to put it in core I have no issue with that,
>>> however the plugin is a maven project an I don’t think maven projects are
>>> wanted in JMeter core :)
>>> 
>>> JMeter does not use Maven as its build tool.
>>> It would be a major effort to convert to Maven, so it's not going to
>>> be done just in order to support a Maven plugin.
>>> If indeed it is ever done (but that is another discussion).
>>> 
>>> However the plugin clearly does not have to be part of the same source
>>> tree / build process as JMeter (it's not currently).
>>> I think it is better for it to have an entirely separate release
>>> process, as it is not only affected by the JMeter version.
>>> It's going to be far more dependent on Maven changes.
>>> 
>>> Whether or not it is sensible for the JMeter project to own / maintain
>>> the code is another matter.
>>> I think not, because JMeter is usable with lots of other build / test
>>> tools, and is usable stand-alone.
>>> 
>>> It does not make sense for the JMeter project to maintain plugins for
>>> all the possible tools.
>>> If we take on a Maven plugin, then how about Groovy, Jenkins,
>>> Buildbot, Gradle etc?
>>> This does not scale. Furthermore, the code most needs Maven developer
>>> expertise, not JMeter expertise.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> If Mark is ok with this, what about having a separate sister project of
>> jmeter for the maven plugin (maybe also the jenkins one if we have some
>> volunteers)
>> It could be (if incubated and agreed upon) under the Apache umbrella and
>> we could(those who want) participate to it.
>> 
>> The release process would be partly dependant on jmeter but as sebb wrote
>> also on maven /jenkins.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>>> The website is down at the moment, it’s in the process of being moved
>>> over to github.io. (I should probably update the README to note that)
>>>> 
>>>>> On 4 Mar 2016, at 09:51, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra0...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Mark,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I don't have problem with JMeter-Maven-Plugin (and your documentation
>>>>> rocks) in particularity
>>>>> 
>>>>> It's only my experience with third party plugin in general and project
>>> with
>>>>> only one developer.
>>>>> And this experience is not always good and it's why I don't like to
>>> advise
>>>>> my customer to use these projects/plugins
>>>>> 
>>>>> One question, why don't integrate officially your plugin to JMeter
>>> core?
>>>>> 
>>>>> About your website, I have a timeout :-(
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks to your feedback
>>>>> 
>>>>> Antonio
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cet e-mail a été envoyé depuis un ordinateur protégé par Avast.
>>>>> www.avast.com
>>>>> <
>>> https://www.avast.com/fr-fr/lp-esg-win-01a?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=OA-2109-C
>>>> 
>>>>> <#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2016-03-04 9:29 GMT+01:00 Mark Collin <mark.col...@lazeryattack.com>:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Lack of official feature (JMeter plugin, Maven plugin, etc.)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> non official maven plugin exists and works rather nicely.
>>>>>>>> What do you mean by JMeter plugin ?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> In general I have very bad experience with:
>>>>>>> third party plugin (not well integrate, not well tested, not up to
>>> date
>>>>>>> with the latest release, etc.)
>>>>>>> Plugin maintained by only one person (less motivation by the
>>> developer,
>>>>>>> etc.)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Bug fixes for the maven plugin are happily accepted.  Also please add
>>>>>> issues for things that are:
>>>>>> Not well integrated
>>>>>> Not well tested
>>>>>> Not up to date
>>>>>> So that we can fix them (
>>>>>> https://github.com/jmeter-maven-plugin/jmeter-maven-plugin/issues).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> In regards to it being up to date:
>>>>>> The plugin didn’t support JMeter 2.12 Because there were transitive
>>>>>> dependency issues with the 2.12 maven release.
>>>>>> There were also transitive dependency issues with the JMeter 2.13
>>> release
>>>>>> that we tried to work around.  Version 1.10.1 of the plugin does use
>>> JMeter
>>>>>> 2.13.
>>>>>> Is there something else we have missed which makes you say it’s not
>>> up to
>>>>>> date (Feedback is the only way we can make it better)?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> We are planning a version 2.0.0 of the plugin to coincide with a 3.0
>>>>>> JMeter release.  The 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT is available in the Sonatype
>>> snapshots
>>>>>> repository if you want to try it out and provide some feedback so
>>> that we
>>>>>> can make it better that would be really useful.
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Cordialement.
>> Philippe Mouawad.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.

Reply via email to