Hi, I strongly support this idea too
And I can help to migrate some elements if it's easy Antonio 2016-03-06 9:24 GMT+01:00 Milamber <milam...@apache.org>: > > In my head, Advanced include the Basic fields with more option than the > basic. > > Perhaps, use another word for Advanced tab if it's contains only more > options like your screenshot (like "Optional fields" or "More params"). > > In the 'advanced' tab, you have more space, it is not necessary to align > horizontally Source address section and Optional Tasks. They can be align > vertically only imho. > > > > > On 06/03/2016 08:07, Philippe Mouawad wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Sunday, March 6, 2016, Andrey Pokhilko <a...@ya.ru> wrote: >> >> Hi, >>> >>> I strongly support this idea. >>> >>> IMO, there are lot more fields that should go to Advanced: >>> >>> * Implementation >>> * Redirect / Follow / Keep-alive flags >>> * proxy server >>> * timeout fields >>> >>> I agree, but this needs more work. >>> >> My proposal is a first step that can be done rapidly before 3.0. >> Moving the other fields requires moving those out of UrlConfigGui but >> maybe >> It can be done faster that what I think. >> >> Andrey Pokhilko >>> >>> On 03/06/2016 12:39 AM, Philippe Mouawad wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> What do you think of using a JTabbedPane to simplify the UI. >>>> >>>> There would be a Basic Pane for usual parameters and an advanced one for >>>> those which are rarely used. >>>> >>>> >>>> I created https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59129 with >>>> screenshots. >>>> >>>> >>> >
