Hi Vladimir, Could we consider introducing Java 8 in immediate next version for this feature ? This would also allow to introduce the Renderer based on Java 8 Web browser in this version.
Initially it was delayed to N+2 version but it's maybe an opportunity to move faster to java 8. What are the risks of moving to Java8(without immediately using all the syntactic sugar ) ? Regards On Saturday, September 3, 2016, Vladimir Sitnikov < sitnikov.vladi...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'am afraid, adding a method to Timer interface is NOT a backward > compatible change. > What happens is you basically break all the third party timers and force > to recompile third party timers otherwise they do not implement the new > method. > > Can you implement the feature so it is compatible with existing third > party timers? > > > PS Does it make sense to run "JMeter plugins tests" along with regular > jmeter tests so we catch those "backward incompatible" warnings early? > > PPS java 8's default methods on interfaces are watching you) > > Vladimir > > > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad. Ubik-Ingénierie UBIK LOAD PACK Web Site <http://www.ubikloadpack.com/> UBIK LOAD PACK on TWITTER <https://twitter.com/ubikloadpack>
