On Saturday, September 10, 2016, Felix Schumacher < felix.schumac...@internetallee.de> wrote:
> Am 10.09.2016 um 13:41 schrieb Philippe Mouawad: > >> Hello, >> Would you be ok to upgrade to java 8 for next release, I see at least 3 >> short term motivations for that: >> >> - JavaFx browser support. I am ready to commit the renderer. The jdk8 bug >> has been reported and it concerns only certain pages that contain APM >> injected code embedded in xml tag and maybe some similar cases >> - Ability to introduce Timer factor without impacting existing code >> - Ability to use Caffeine for the css issue although minor >> >> For 3.1, no need to migrate to new syntaxes . >> >> Thoughts ? >> > I still think we should not rush to java 8. Is there some issue you know about ? > >> >> If no go, then maybe we can start a release process for 3.1 >> > There are a few things, that I would like to address before we start the > release: > > * bug60066 - handling of CLOBs > * doc for getting rid of our SLF4J initializer > * doc for JDBCSampler (it has an old image and the text seemed to be a > good candidate for some caring) > * Look after bug60092 capping of results No problem, Thanks for your feedback > > Regards, > Felix > >> >> Thanks >> >> >> >> >> > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad.
