On 13 February 2017 at 12:45, Vladimir Sitnikov <[email protected]> wrote: > sebb>Attachments not present; they are dropped by most Apache mailing lists. > > Here's the same mail in Google docs with screenshots: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-Yr_PEOhkLXS8ArKxRVVl-9b8l8Gj-5x0gdgmW5MyJ8/edit?usp=sharing > > > sebb>AFAIK, that does not work in Eclipse > > Well, I might check how it looks like in Eclipse, however it does sound > like a feature on the surface. It is not a rocket science after all. > > Does it really make sense to use "I cannot browse SVN history in Eclipse" > argument? > If that is the case, then any commit would break Eclipse in terms of > history browsing. Does that mean we aim to avoid commits at all? > > By the way: IntelliJ provides opensource licenses for committers.
But not for all the people who may wish to use our code. > sebb>Note also that JMeter uses SVN currently, which behaves differently. > sebb>Try doing the same exercise with a JMeter file. > > Do you mean I should commit some temporary SVN branch with code formatting? I meant see if you can easily find out when a particular line of code was added in a source file that has been subject to lots of formatting changes. I'm sure there are lots of examples. > > Vladimir
