I can start a RC for this Saturday, that's possible? any bug to fix before?
On 28/03/2017 10:07, Maxime Chassagneux wrote:
+1
2017-03-28 10:13 GMT+02:00 Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra0...@gmail.com>:
+1
Antonio
2017-03-27 22:34 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com>:
Hello,
Shall we start the 3.2 release process now that all points have been
handled ?
Regards
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
philippe.moua...@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks a lot Woonsan, merged.
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 6:32 AM, Woonsan Ko <woon...@apache.org>
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Woonsan Ko <woon...@apache.org>
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 7:05 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 20 March 2017 at 22:57, Philippe Mouawad <
philippe.moua...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, March 20, 2017, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
I know I keep going on about this, but the logging documentation
still
needs some work.
The logging level names have changed.
Users need to be told what the mapping is from old name to new
name.
cf comments on r1786590
Work has been done since that time.
Please point to missing information.
Where are the logging levels documented?
I had a quick look and could not find them.
I've submitted a PR: https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/286
Please take a look.
Regards,
Woonsan
Sorry for late response. I'll try to submit a pull request to
clarify
the changes of the available log levels before Monday.
Regards,
Woosnan
On 20 March 2017 at 22:26, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
ra0...@gmail.com
<javascript:;>> wrote:
+1
Antonio
2017-03-20 21:49 GMT+01:00 Philippe Mouawad <
philippe.moua...@gmail.com
<javascript:;>>:
Hello,
AFAIU, there are no more pending points for a release.
Am I wrong ?
If not, could be start a release ?
Thanks
Regards
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
ra0...@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
wrote:
Hi,
I have updated jmeter_accesslog_sampler_step_by_step
document
like I
have
said previously
Antonio
2017-03-16 14:25 GMT+01:00 Andrey Pokhilko <a...@ya.ru
<javascript:;>
:
We have fixed them and released plugin updates. For the
record, it
were:
* OAuth Sampler broken - we decided to deprecate it
* JMX Check tool were failing on call to removed
"org.apache.jmeter.save.SaveService.loadTree(
InputStream
inputStream)", we've released update with other method
used
* Synthesis report were failing on call to modified
"org.apache.jmeter.save.CSVSaveService#saveCSVStats(
java.util.List<?>,
java.io.FileWriter, java.lang.String[])", we've
released
update
that
uses different method
* BlazeMeter Debugger plugin fails due to changes to
LoggerPanel
and
several other changes around logging, we have no good
solution
for
now, that will work on both JMeter 3.1 and 3.2. We
need
more
time
to
work on it and we don't consider it as release
blocker.
Andrey Pokhilko
On 16.03.2017 16:03, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
What are the other "number of issues " ?
Thanks
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Andrey Pokhilko <
a...@ya.ru
<javascript:;>> wrote:
Hi,
Yes, it's that message. The bugzilla is here:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60874
Andrey Pokhilko
On 16.03.2017 16:01, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
Hello Andrey,
Thanks for your tests.
We're waiting for the Bugzilla, is it the issue
mentioned
by
somebody
on
mailing list about a constant for Scripting languages
?
Thanks
Regards
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Andrey Pokhilko <
a...@ya.ru
<javascript:;>>
wrote:
Hi,
From plugins side, we've made check in BlazeMeter and
found a
number
of
issues, mainly because of deleted methods and fields.
We
have
fixed
some
of them, but one is specifically breaking WebDriver
sampler.
We're
going
to file bugzilla on it.
IMO it's not good to release without fixing this,
since
it will
break
everyone who uses WebDriver Sampler.
Andrey Pokhilko
On 16.03.2017 15:32, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
Hello,
Any feedback on patch ?
Shall we proceed with release without fixing it ?
Is there any other remaining work ?
Thanks
Regards
Philippe
On Sunday, March 12, 2017, Philippe Mouawad <
philippe.moua...@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
wrote:
Hello,
I've filled New and Noteworthy section, feel free
to
improve.
I've also documented migration to new logging.
I think we can now release the 3.2 except for this
bug
which
exists
since
many versions, I've attached a patch for review:
- https://bz.apache.org/
bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830
Regards
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 10:14 PM, Antonio Gomes
Rodrigues <
ra0...@gmail.com <javascript:;>
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ra0...@gmail.com
<javascript:;>');>> wrote:
Hi,
Modifications in the PR done
Antonio
2017-03-06 15:51 GMT+01:00 Antonio Gomes
Rodrigues <
ra0...@gmail.com <javascript:;>
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ra0...@gmail.com
<javascript:;>');>>:
Hi Philippe
2017-03-06 8:40 GMT+01:00 Philippe Mouawad <
philippe.moua...@gmail.com <javascript:;>
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','
philippe.moua...@gmail.com
<javascript:;>');>>:
Hello Antonio,
I 've reviewed it rapidly:
- button at the bottom => In nightly build it is
at
top
now
and
buttons
have changed
Ok, I will modify it
- With the gui, but it's not recommended to big
load test
=>
With
the
gui,
but just during debug phase, use Non GUI for
your
load
test.
Ok, I will modify it
I think you should mention that between
Validation
phase
and
Run
phase
there is variabilization and Correlation phase.
Not added because it's not present in the
original
document
I will mention it and add some tips
Antonio
Thanks
Regards
On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Antonio Gomes
Rodrigues <
ra0...@gmail.com <javascript:;>
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','
ra0...@gmail.com <javascript:;>
');>
wrote:
Hi,
I have modified jmeter proxy step by step
document
See my modifications in
https://github.com/apache/
jmeter/pull/279
If it's ok, I will commit it in svn
Antonio
2017-03-02 10:47 GMT+01:00 Maxime Chassagneux <
maxime.chassagn...@gmail.com <javascript:;>
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','
maxime.chassagn...@gmail.com
<javascript:;>')
;>>
:
Hi,
I have to update some screen + documentation
for
the JMS
change
made
by
me.
I will do it ASAP.
2017-03-01 23:36 GMT+01:00 Antonio Gomes
Rodrigues <
ra0...@gmail.com <javascript:;>
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','
ra0...@gmail.com <javascript:;>
');>
:
2017-03-01 23:03 GMT+01:00 Philippe Mouawad <
philippe.moua...@gmail.com <javascript:;>
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','
philippe.moua...@gmail.com
<javascript:;>');>
:
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 10:59 PM, Antonio
Gomes
Rodrigues
<
ra0...@gmail.com <javascript:;>
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ra0...@gmail.com
<javascript:;>');>
wrote:
Hi,
1.
One question, in jmeter_tutorial.html file
we
talk
about a
screenshot
which
exit in pdf file but not in html file:
"From
the
screen
capture, we
see
the
following directories. "
I propose to remove this sentence instead
of
adding
the
screen
+1
Done
Later we talk about:
"monitortomcat 5 monitor components"
"htmlparsera snapshot of HtmlParser,
donated
by
HtmlParser
project
on
sourceforge"
These folders don't exist anymore, can I
remove them?
+1
Done
If you are ok, I can make the modifications
now
2.
About jmeter_accesslog_sampler_step_
by_step.html
file
My opinion is that this is a gadget and I
have
never
seen
someone
make
serious load test with access.log file (no
correlation
between
url...)
I think we need to remove it from homepage
+0, I have seen some blogs about this
feature.
It can suit some use cases where correlation
is
not
needed.
In these conditions, I think we need to had
more
general
cases
where
access
logs might be inappropriate.
I will work on it tomorrow
3.
About jmeter_proxy_step_by_step.html
I think we need to write it again to talk
to
all the
new
features
(template...)
I can do it this week
+1
Antonio
2017-03-01 22:30 GMT+01:00 Antonio Gomes
Rodrigues <
ra0...@gmail.com <javascript:;>
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','
ra0...@gmail.com <javascript:;>
');>
:
Hi,
my fault, the PDF links have been removed
I check the 5 files and give a feedback
asap
Antonio
2017-03-01 22:16 GMT+01:00 Philippe
Mouawad
<
philippe.moua...@gmail.com <javascript:;>
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','
philippe.moua...@gmail.com
<javascript:;>');>
:
Hi Antonio,
I removed PDF links, are you sure you
generated
last
docs
?
Thanks
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 10:14 PM, Antonio
Gomes
Rodrigues <
ra0...@gmail.com <javascript:;>
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ra0...@gmail.com
<javascript:;>');>>
wrote:
Thanks,
Is it normal that pdf file still exist
and
the
link
in
the
left
(Tutorials
(PDF format)) are sill to pdf files?
Antonio
2017-03-01 21:52 GMT+01:00 Felix
Schumacher
<
felix.schumac...@internetallee.de
<javascript:;>
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','felix.schumacher@
internetallee.de
');>>:
Am 01.03.2017 um 21:07 schrieb Antonio
Gomes
Rodrigues:
Hi,
About " Ensure the migrated docs (from
PDF) do
not
contain
old
"Urban
legends"
:-) nor bad practices. Those are
the 4
Tutorial
links
in
left
menu.
It
would be nice to review them. I've
fixed
some
but
not
done
the
full
work"
Which files are?
Look for xml files in the xdocs folder,
which are
named
as
the
tutorials
on the jmeter homepage in the menu.
They
should
be:
xdocs/usermanual/jmeter_
distributed_testing_step_by_
step.xml
xdocs/usermanual/jmeter_proxy_
step_by_step.xml
xdocs/usermanual/junitsampler_
tutorial.xml
xdocs/usermanual/jmeter_access
log_sampler_step_by_step.xml
xdocs/usermanual/jmeter_tutorial.xml
Felix
Thanks
Antonio
2017-03-01 10:44 GMT+01:00 Antonio
Gomes
Rodrigues
<
ra0...@gmail.com <javascript:;>
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ra0...@gmail.com
<javascript:;>');>
:
Hi,
2017-02-28 22:54 GMT+01:00 Philippe
Mouawad <
philippe.moua...@gmail.com
<javascript:;>
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','
philippe.moua...@gmail.com
<javascript:;>');>
:
Hello,
We're now at:
- 48 Enhancements
- 31 bug fixes
Sebb has fixed Windows failures on
Jenkins
- Ensure the migrated docs (from
PDF) do
not
contain
old
"Urban
legends"
:-) nor bad practices. Those are
the 4
Tutorial
links
in
left
menu.
It
would be nice to review them.
I've
fixed
some
but
not
done
the
full
work
TODO
I will check them today
- Fill in introduced properties
in
properties_reference.xml
DONE
- If possible add JUnits on the
regression
introduced
in
GET
with
no
body (see my mail)
DONE
- Fill in New and Noteworthy
section
TODO
Are you ok to start a release soon ?
Ok
Thanks
Regards
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 4:21 PM,
sebb
<
seb...@gmail.com <javascript:;>
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','
seb...@gmail.com <javascript:;>
');>>
wrote:
I'm seeing some test failures on
Windows.
I've started to set up a Jenkins
build
to be
able
to
catch
these.
(at present the failure mails are
sent
direct to
me)
Depending on the cause, the
failures
need to
be
fixed
before
the
next
release.
On 11 February 2017 at 10:22,
Philippe
Mouawad
<philippe.moua...@gmail.com
<javascript:;>
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','
philippe.moua...@gmail.com
<javascript:;>');>>
wrote:
Hello,
Since our discussion on "Release a
3.2 ?" ,
trunk
has
nicely
evolved:
- 33 Enhancements
- 25 bug fixes
I think we can now plan a release.
I see the following remaining
work:
- Ensure the migrated docs
(from
PDF) do
not
contain
old
"Urban
legends"
:-) nor bad practices. Those
are
the 4
Tutorial
links
in
left
menu. It
would be nice to review them.
I've
fixed
some
but
not
done
the
full
work
- Fill in introduced
properties
in
properties_reference.xml
- If possible add JUnits on
the
regression
introduced
in
GET
with
no
body (see my mail)
- Fill in New and Noteworthy
section
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
