Hello Any feedback on this ? Thanks On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Philippe Mouawad < p.moua...@ubik-ingenierie.com> wrote:
> Hello, > How about not adding this anymore if not set and having a property that > allows to do that ? > > - post_add_content_type_if_missing=false > > > What is the risk ? > > As per: > > - https://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec7.html > > Any HTTP/1.1 message containing an entity-body SHOULD include a > Content-Type header field defining the media type of that body. If and only > if the media type is not given by a Content-Type field, the recipient MAY > attempt to guess the media type via inspection of its content and/or the > name extension(s) of the URI used to identify the resource. If the media > type remains unknown, the recipient SHOULD treat it as type > "application/octet-stream". > > > -- > Regards. > Philippe > > > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad. Ubik-Ingénierie UBIK LOAD PACK Web Site <http://www.ubikloadpack.com/> UBIK LOAD PACK on TWITTER <https://twitter.com/ubikloadpack>
