+1 too

2018-04-01 16:20 GMT+02:00 Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra0...@gmail.com>:

> +1
>
> Le dim. 1 avr. 2018 15:50, Andrey Pokhilko <a...@ya.ru> a écrit :
>
> > "Flow Control Action"?
> >
> > Andrey Pokhilko
> >
> > 01.04.2018 16:49, Jmeter Tea пишет:
> > > Most samplers ends with Sampler and none with Action.
> > > And this Sampler *controls* the execution of the test.
> > > I know it's not a controller, but I suggest a name as "Control Sampler"
> > or
> > > " "Execution Control Sampler"
> > >
> > > On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 10:29 AM, Andrey Pokhilko <a...@ya.ru> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> "Test" sounds redundant to me. Everything we do in JMeter is a test.
> So
> > >> maybe just "Logical Action"?
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >> Andrey Pokhilko
> > >>
> > >> 30.03.2018 18:15, UBIK LOAD PACK Support пишет:
> > >>> Hello,
> > >>>
> > >>> TestAction in JMeter is a very useful element but its name is
> > misleading
> > >> or
> > >>> not clear at all.
> > >>>
> > >>> Currently it allows:
> > >>>
> > >>>    - Pausing
> > >>>    - Stopping Test
> > >>>    - Stopping Test immediately
> > >>>    - Switching to next thread loop iteration
> > >>>    - We'll soon propose a patch to add:
> > >>>       - Switch to next iteration of current loop : : It will be
> > >> equivalent
> > >>>       of "continue" in the the first parent loop that contains it
> > >>>       - Break current loop : It will break the first parent loop that
> > >>>       contains it, equivalent of "break" in algorithm
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> When we provide training or discuss with JMeter beginners, TestAction
> > is
> > >>> usually understood as something to debug or "test", and nobody thinks
> > >> that
> > >>> is allows all this.
> > >>>
> > >>> Shouldn't it be renamed to something like:
> > >>>
> > >>>    - Test Logic Action
> > >>>    - Logical Action
> > >>>    - Test Logical Action
> > >>>    - Test Execution Modifier
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards
> > >>> UbikLoadPack Support Team
> > >>> <http://twitter.com/ubikloadpack>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to