Am 28. Mai 2019 22:24:23 MESZ schrieb Vladimir Sitnikov
<[email protected]>:
>Felix>I like to find them in the current repo I am working on and think
>that
>Felix>searching historic versions is so much easier in git than in svn,
>but
>Felix>you are of course right, that I could find them in the svn repo
>(given
>Felix>that we both think it will stay available as read only).
>
>There's a middle ground: we could have *two* Git repositories.
>The one with just the minimum set of required branches/tags (==used for
>main development).
>Another one could hold extra tags/branches. So the ones who are
>interested
>in those could fetch from that repo.
>
>Then mainline repo is not cluttered by outdated branches/tags, and you
>can
>still have all the refs in your working copy.
>
>However that might be an overkill since I don't really imagine much
>good
>from browsing historical "test" branches.
I think that would be overkill.
Felix
>
>Vladimir
