To Rahul-san.
> I have same understanding. I am unable to understand that why extra jmx file > is > used, it is not clear from the file as outcome. To list up correlate variable, we need to compare 2 jmx file and find and list up variable that value is different. So it need extra jmx file. > Imoto, > Can we have better way rather than selecting correlation candidates manually > in table? Table show candidate of variable and value. I think from this information, user easily select which variable are correlate value. (If value is random, it might be correlate variable) To avoid miss setting, I add manual selected process. I thinks other tools do same process. > Auto-correlation should not involve manual steps and why rules are mandatory > here. Rule file are not mandatory, it is option file that describe previous mail. I think it can skip manual selecting, but to avoid miss setting and to confirm, it might be better to show table and select correlate variable. > I have seen same implementation in some other load testing tool, so it would > be > great if you can share patent list. I check LoadRunner’s patent list as following, but these patent does not refer to correlating. 5,701,139 System for tracking and replicating the operation of a cursor manipulation device 5,657,438 Interactive system for developing tests of system under test allowing independent positioning of execution start and stop markers to execute subportion of test script 5,511,185 System for automatic testing of computer software having output synchronization and capable of responding to asynchronous events 5,870,559 Software system and associated methods for facilitating the analysis and management of web sites 5,958,008 Software system and associated methods for scanning and mapping dynamically-generated web documents 5,974,572 Software system and methods for generating a load test using a server access log 6,138,157 Method and apparatus for testing web sites 6,144,962 Visualization of web sites and hierarchical data structures 6,205,122 Automatic network topology analysis 6,237,006 Methods for graphically representing web sites and hierarchical node structures 6,341,310 System and methods for facilitating the viewing and analysis of web site usage data 6,360,332 Software system and methods for testing the functionality of a transactional server Thanks. > -----Original Message----- > From: Rahul Mehta <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2019 4:16 AM > To: Vladimir Sitnikov <[email protected]> > Cc: ApacheJMeter dev list <[email protected]>; necti_openiv_swe > <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: [OpenIV:0551] Re: Bugzilla Enhancement: "Auto-Correlation as > core functionality in JMeter" > > Hi Vladimir, > > I have same understanding. I am unable to understand that why extra jmx file > is > used, it is not clear from the file as outcome. > > Imoto, > Can we have better way rather than selecting correlation candidates manually > in table? > > Auto-correlation should not involve manual steps and why rules are mandatory > here. > > I have seen same implementation in some other load testing tool, so it would > be > great if you can share patent list. > > > Regards, > Rahul > > On Tuesday, November 26, 2019, Vladimir Sitnikov < > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > >About new feature of auto-correlation, we prepared specification > > >written > > as manual. > > > > That is great. It really helps to preview the feature. > > > > However, I fail to understand what is "correlation with JMX file". > > I see it consumes an extra JMX file, but it is not clear what should > > be there in the file, it is not clear what is added as a result. > > > > Does "Correlation" differ from "Auto-Correlation"? Should just one of > > them be used in all the places? > > Is there a "manual correlation"? > > > > How Rule differs from Correlation? > > Is Rule mandatory for Correlation to work? > > > > Vladimir > > > >
