Is 1.1 already stable? If so any works but id do a 1.0 before or at the same time.
Le 22 nov. 2016 20:09, "Mark Struberg" <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> a écrit : > following bval I'd rather name it 1.1 and evenutally propagate the current > master and do a release for 'prospect' reasons? ;) > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > Am 22.11.2016 um 19:56 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com > >: > > > > 2016-11-22 19:50 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>: > > > >> subject says it all ;) > >> > >> I suspect we go 1.0 for our next mainstream version. > >> What version do we like to use for our JSON-P 1.1 work? > >> This effectively also means that we move to Java8, so do we like to use > >> > >> a.) johnzon-1.1 > >> or > >> b.) johnzon-2.0 > >> > >> > > would be consistent with our "EE" tracking/following and like any asf > > project so less misleading IMO assuming we have 1.0 > > > > ...but we never got a 1.0 so abis) 1.0 > > > > would that make sense? > > > > > >> LieGrue, > >> strub > >> > >
