Maybe raise a spec issue since we tend to be jsonb driven now. Would be great to not have a custom api for the id mapping.
In the mean time we can push a jsonb-extra with that impl Le 23 avr. 2018 18:39, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <jeano...@gmail.com> a écrit : > Hey Roberto, > > I think that would be a great feature. > Already had this case in the past and looks like Jackson and Gson already > have it. > > Gson subtypes on adapters. > https://github.com/google/gson/blob/master/extras/src/ > main/java/com/google/gson/typeadapters/RuntimeTypeAdapterFactory.java > > > Jackson annotations with different strategies > https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-docs/wiki/ > JacksonPolymorphicDeserialization > > We should consider adding this feature I believe. > > > Le mer. 18 avr. 2018 à 19:42, Roberto Cortez <radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid> > a écrit : > > > Hi Romain, > > Thanks for the quick response. > > I'll have a look, > > Cheers,Roberto > > On Wednesday, April 18, 2018, 6:35:32 PM GMT+1, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Roberto > > > > Yes, an adapter is the way to go using our mapper or jsonb. > > > > There should be an "animal" test showing how to do that. Just dont forget > > to use class aliases or a whitelist logic to not open a backdoor. > > > > Since the model doesnt match the java model im not a fan of that feature > > being built out of the box. In xml it is more natural but in json you can > > do it without breaking the model. For me it means the model is broken and > > must not be used as an input. > > > > Le 18 avr. 2018 19:31, "Roberto Cortez" <radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid> a > > écrit : > > > > > Hi guys, > > > I'm trying to serialize a list of elements of multiple types and then > > > deserialize it again. It does require to somehow include the type in > the > > > serialization result to know to which type we should map to > deserialize. > > I > > > think this could possible be done with an Adapter and playing with the > > > JsonArray. > > > I was just wondering if there any kind of out of the box support for > > this. > > > It doesn't seem so, at least I was not able to find. > > > Jackson for instance, includes a set of annotations that allow you to > do > > > exactly this, without any extra / custom code. > > > Any thoughts? > > > Thank you. > > > Cheers,Roberto >
