Le ven. 13 mai 2022 à 16:57, David Blevins <[email protected]> a écrit :
> > On May 12, 2022, at 11:17 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hi David, > > > > Just had a look and it seems it is mainly about ensuring we'll move > master > > to 1.3.0-SNAPSHOT (can need a thread at least for visibility) > > Good idea. Created a thread on 1.3 with the motivations so that is > documented on list and we can get feedback if any. > > > and cleaning > > up ExceptionMessages (simpleName impl) then we can move forward I think. > > Is there any chance for some flexibility on that method? > > My big concern is that if I push back we'll find ourselves in a debate on > calling class.getSimpleName() vs using string manipulation and that will > come at the expense of time we could spend collaborating on more > fun/impactful things. We're likely another 3 or 4 PRs before we could get > the items in the reports addressed and 1.3 out the door. > Im fine with current code if there is some enforcement (tests) we dont support any other Type cases - thinking it is harder than simplifying the impl i proposed it but while we have something simple to grok for all supported types i m actually fine. > > -David > >
