Hi,
not publishing binaries on dist is 100% fine for me. I actually
discovered this because I wanted to add the 2.0.0 links to the site and
found out they don't work.
I'd say just drop the links to binary distribution for 1.0.x and 1.2.x
and link to maven central, WDYT?
Thanks
Markus
On 30.11.23 16:00, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hi,
Think we should stick to the "source bundle only" rule when it comes to
*dist*, nobody consumes artifacts from there anyway cause it is not stable
(done for human only) so no point polluting our storage IMHO.
So nothing to do for me, vote was good.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
Le jeu. 30 nov. 2023 à 15:56, Jean-Louis Monteiro <[email protected]>
a écrit :
I can add them of course
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 2:05 PM Markus Jung <[email protected]> wrote:
Hey all,
just noticed there are no binaries of Johnzon 2.0.0 on
https://archive.apache.org/dist/johnzon/johnzon-2.0.0/
Looking at other releases there sometimes are binaries, sometimes not:
- 1.0.0 has them (.zip)
- 1.1.0 has them (.zip)
- earlier 1.2.x release are missing those
- 1.2.21 has them (.zip and .tar)
- 2.0.0 missing again
Perhaps this is a manual step that just hasn't been done yet (and thus
can still be fixed)? Or something that's gone wrong while releasing?
Binaries on maven central look perfectly fine to me
Thanks!
Markus
