Hmm, not what has been done for several incubator project votes end of last year.
Was pretty sure the rule was relaxed - or did it change again? - when 3 IPMC voted on dev@ and general@ got the vote mail to avoid to hang on the 2nd general@ vote. That said what would be the plan now: johnzon was voted to graduate and we got 3 IPMC votes so I guess it is more a formal step than anything else. Just let me know. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber <http://www.tomitribe.com> 2016-02-23 4:14 GMT+01:00 Justin Mclean <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > > I fwded the vote to general list so it is not needed normally. > > It is always required see [1]: > "Podlings in Incubation SHALL NOT perform any releases of software without > the explicit approval of the Incubator PMC." > > There no need to inform the IPMC of a vote taking place and it has to be > voted on by the IPMC after the PPMC vote has taken place. > > "Therefore, should a Podling decide it wishes to perform a release, the > Podling SHALL hold a vote on the Podling's public -dev list.” > “then the Podling SHALL send a summary of that vote to the Incubator's > general < > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/howtoparticipate.html#Mailing+lists>list > and formally request the Incubator PMC approve such a release." > > In the case where you already have 3 IPMC votes on the PPMC dev list you > still have to a IPMC vote, it is however acceptable for IPMC to forward > their votes. > > This has been discussed at length on general @ I can hunt down the links > if you need. > > Thanks, > Justin > > 1. http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
