Le 27 mars 2016 18:17, "Mark Struberg" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > What other extensions? What is the use case?
Reusing the classmapping mainly > Again: it’s not part of the contract, so we might break this with any release… > This is fine while info are available > LieGrue, > strub > > > > Am 27.03.2016 um 17:54 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected] >: > > > > Le 27 mars 2016 17:44, "Mark Struberg" <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> > >> Hi! > >> > >> I’m currently rewviewing and cleaning up stuff. > >> > >> Here are a few questions: > >> > >> 1.) Why is the Mapper ct public? It should imo only get created via > > MapperBuilder. > >> 2.) Why are the config switches in Mapper protected? > >> > > > > Both are used by extensions in other projects. > > > >> I’m currently refactoring all this out into a MapperConfig which is > > immutable and can get passed around without duplicating too much. > >> > > > > No pb to break it while info is available to potential extensions > > > >> LieGrue, > >> strub >
