you're right Chris, thanks (and +1 from me as well). Regards, Tommaso
Il giorno lun 17 dic 2018 alle ore 17:56 Henry Saputra < [email protected]> ha scritto: > +1 > > I think dicussion ans agreement is needed if the project wants to get > onboarded early. > > Otherwise, we will be move as part of later migration anyway. > > - Henry > > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018, 8:46 AM Chris Mattmann <[email protected] wrote: > > > +1, and it’s my understanding that it’s not a choice. There will be only > > Gitbox, and we will move eventually whether we want to or not ☺ > > > > Let’s move to Gitbox, +1. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Chris Mattmann > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]> > > Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > Date: Monday, December 17, 2018 at 8:45 AM > > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > Subject: moving to Gitbox > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > Given the recent announcement about gitbox.apache.org [1] (seamless > > > > integration with GitHub) I was wondering about moving from git-ws* to > > > > gitbox to allow better PR support (we can merge PRs by clicking > > > > *merge* button from Github), that may help us towards more and more > > > > effective contributions. > > > > > > > > WDYT? > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Tommaso > > > > > > > > [1] : https://gitbox.apache.org/ > > > > > > > > >
