On 6/14/08, Charles Oliver Nutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't really see a reason not to, other than that JNA has native libs > that would not take kindly to package renaming. One thing I *don't* like > about the renaming is that if I want to use any of those libraries from > within Ruby code (like ASM) I have to import the mangled name. That kinda > sucks :(
The conflict I have right now (and it's really a *potential* conflict) is with Joda Time. Haven't tried renaming the JNA classes yet, and sort of suspected that might not work. If renaming the Joda Time classes (to jruby,joda.time.*) won't cause a problem for anyone, I'll go ahead and do that. But will hold off for a day or two for comments, As for importing "mangled" names in Ruby code, won't jarjar take care of that auto-magically? -Bill
