Nick Sieger wrote:
Maybe you should rename it to jruby-jline or something to indicate how you intend to fix things to work with JRuby. You're not necessarily taking over maintenance of jline for any possible consumers, right? You just want to make it work better for JRuby and will incorporate the code into JRuby releases.
Well that's a good point; if we just folded it straight into JRuby we would have full control. We'll cross that bridge if we come to it; I'd rather have readline-ffi "just work" and ditch jline entirely.
- Charlie --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
