On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 5:51 AM, Thomas E Enebo<[email protected]> wrote:
> For clarification (for more general JI audience), I think in theory we
> should consider changing JRuby so:
>
> beanHome = PortableRemoteObject.narrow(home, BeanHome)
>
> I believe this is more or less unambiguous. I really don't think
> anyone would be asking for our IRubyObject.class of the proxy. After
> all we know whether it is a proxy or not for a Java class.
Gods yes...I've almost made this change a dozen times and just haven't
gotten around to it. The duality of the "outer" proxy class with the
"inner" JavaClass is a source of unending frustration for me in
BiteScript/Duby/Ruby2Java and so on.
- Charlie
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
