Hi, quick note, as it's nearly 2.00am here; done almost all steps required to publish all artifacts on a staging repo, which the vote is going to be run against. Currently blocked by a nexus timeout on closing the staging repo, progress can be followed at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7105. Once this is fixed (hopefully by tomorrow..), the vote for 2.10.0 release will be called.
br, juan pablo On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:50 PM, Siegfried Goeschl < siegfried.goes...@it20one.com> wrote: > Hi Juan Pablo, > > I will play around with the current trunk :-) > > Cheers, > > Siegfried Goeschl > > > On 16 Dec 2013, at 22:03, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez < > juanpablo.san...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > just finished doing a big bunch of pending refactors prior to releasing > > 2.10. We should be able to end up with all the artifacts on maven central > > too (once the vote+release passes), and use a staged repository[#1] to > vote > > instead of uploading to somewhere at people.a.o > > > > There are only a couple of points remaining: updating UPGRADING and > > ReleaseNotes and ensuring all the prerequisites of [#1] are met. > Hopefully, > > they will be done between today and tomorrow. In the meantime, this is a > > call for testing current trunk, which is going to be most likely 2.10.0. > > I've tried to test all the recent commits (and will continue to do some > > more testing), but for sure the more people looking into it before voting > > the release, the better. > > > > > > thanks + br, > > juan pablo > > > > > > [#1]: > > http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html#staging-maven > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Siegfried Goeschl < > > siegfried.goes...@it20one.at> wrote: > > > >> Hi folks, > >> > >> IMHO it is important to get the release out > >> > >> * users are looking at project activity - there are many different wikis > >> out there ... > >> > >> * are there bugfixes in 2.9.1 the users would appreciate? Better have a > >> small bugfix release now than the latest and greatest release 9 months > down > >> the road (which might get delayed later on) > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> Siegfried Goeschl > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On 10.11.13 21:39, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> about 2.9 vs 2.10, I was having in mind releasing trunk in any case, > the > >>> version numbers were just to note binary compatibility. If we release > >>> current trunk as it is, it isn't binary compatible with latest release, > >>> because of 2.10.0-svn-8 and 2.10.0-svn-26. We could copy those classes > >>> back > >>> to their original location and have 2.9.2 (with some duplicated > classes) > >>> or > >>> just release 2.10.0 as it is. I'm a little inclined to 2.9.2, because I > >>> was > >>> having in mind further similar refactorings with the rest of the > managers > >>> for 2.10, but given the fact I've been unable to spend time coding > these > >>> last months, 2.10 would also be fine for me. > >>> > >>> As an aside, there's an initial Infra setup [#1] to allow us to deploy > to > >>> repository.apache.org, which is synced with central. Once that is > done, > >>> I'll update the appropiate page on jspwiki.a.o > >>> > >>> > >>> br, > >>> juan pablo > >>> > >>> [#1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6986 > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:39 PM, Glen Mazza <glen.ma...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Yes, I don't see any need to release the same 2.9.1 product just > without > >>>> "incubator" in its version name, that's not a very Apache-esque way of > >>>> doing things (the "incubator" in version release is not an indicator > of > >>>> software quality, as Apache stresses over and over.) If none of us > >>>> right > >>>> now have time to work on JSPWiki (a situation I hope changes soon with > >>>> me), > >>>> busywork such as that isn't going to help the situation. > >>>> > >>>> Glen > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 11/08/2013 01:02 PM, Harry Metske wrote: > >>>> > >>>> what would be reasons to release 2.9.x versus 2.10.x ? > >>>>> The latter has more issues fixed... > >>>>> > >>>>> regards, > >>>>> Harry > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On 8 November 2013 08:41, Jürgen Weber <juer...@jwi.de> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> +1 > >>>>> > >>>>>> Am 07.11.2013 19:33 schrieb "Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez" < > >>>>>> juanpablo.san...@gmail.com>: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> +1 too > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> In order to remain 2.9.x, we should get back o.a.w.WikiException > >>>>>>> (deleted > >>>>>>> in favour of o.a.w.api.WikiException) and maybe one or two similar > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> changes, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> have to check svn to be sure.. Otherwise we should release 2.10.0 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I'm thinking we could also use this release to publish the release > on > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> ASF's > >>>>>> > >>>>>> maven repo, so we also end up on central. WDYT? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> br, > >>>>>>> juan pablo > >>>>>>> El 05/11/2013 17:07, "Harry Metske" <harry.met...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>> escribió: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> +1 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 5 November 2013 16:50, Jürgen Weber <juer...@jwi.de> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Currently the dev mailing list is a bit lonely, there seems not a > >>>>>>>> lot > >>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>> going on. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I suggest that JSPWiki 2.9.1 come out from incubator. > >>>>>>>>> Actually 2.9.1 looks good. Why not release it? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Release_early,_release_often > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>>> Juergen > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >> > >
