[Switching to dev, so everyone can hop in] As for now, we show an advice on the footer, stating that the content is AL; maybe we should reword that so it's made clearer, as it's seen on every page. If don't state that the content is AL there, I could upload my own plugin without knowing or linking the ContributedPlugins page and I could argue that the copyright notice wasn't visible.
Regarding personal pages, right now, I'd leave them, as the signal-to-noise ratio is still high, and those pages link, or contain valuable info/contributed plugins. If it worsens I'd be would be in favour of being stricter granting rw access, but for now it seems to me ok, as a large % of those personal/sandbox pages are ending up in being proper contributions. In any case, I'm eager to hear what others think about this, and won't mind to change my opinion if enough people think we should be stricter / would be nice to have a sandbox wiki / etc. br, juan pablo On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Jürgen Weber <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Juan Pablo, > > actually I think personal pages at an apache.org site is not a good idea. > We should ask Glen about this. Especially reading what he wrote here: > https://jspwiki-wiki.apache.org/Diff.jsp?page=ContributedPlugins&r1=13&r2=12 > > One could even be more strict with added content and require that it go > via a JIRA attachment.. > > As for playing with the Wiki, there should be a Sandbox page, which would > be world writeable and which should be deleted by a batch job every hour or > so. > > But we should discuss this, either via a Jira or on dev. > > Greetings, Jürgen > Am 19.08.2014 17:27 schrieb "Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez" < > [email protected]>: > > Hi Jürgen, >> >> thanks for looking into this! I've checked to see what type of content is >> being posted, but they seem to me as personal/sandbox pages, created from >> different IPs, which was somewhat usual/normal when hosted at >> www.jspwiki.org. Do you think the wiki should stick to documentation (or >> perhaps we should use another wiki instance to host this kind of pages)? As >> it was difficult to get the VM and wiki running, we sticked to one >> instance, but we could set up for another redirection if needed (however, I >> feel that this kind of decision should be made at dev@) >> >> For now, let's wait to see how they evolve, or if new spam-suspicious >> pages are created. If they come to be spam, we could follow the same policy >> followed by the infra guys, that is, grant access to anyone who asks on >> [email protected], for instance, or whatever we decide at dev@.. >> >> >> cheers, >> juan pablo >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Jürgen Weber <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Juan Pablo, >>> >>> looks like the jspwiki-wiki.apache.org is beeing spammed: >>> https://jspwiki-wiki.apache.org/Wiki.jsp?page=RecentChanges >>> >>> I guess new users should be closed, which is a pity. >>> >>> How could one restrict the valid users? Only ones, that have written >>> something serious on the mailing list? Only G+ accounts? Only apache >>> accounts? >>> >>> Greetings, Juergen >>> >> >>
