+1 I am using the haddock template a long time already too. Regards, Harry
Op 23 jul. 2017 13:14 schreef "Juan Pablo Santos RodrÃguez" < juanpablo.san...@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > I would be +1 on that. IMHO then version should be switched to 2.11.0? it > will most probably imply changes for people with existing default-based > templates, they should at least specify in jspwiki-custom.properties that > they want the default template. And re-reading the last sentence, maybe we > should also rename the default template to clean template or something > along those lines? > > > br, > jp > > On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Dave Koelmeyer < > dave.koelme...@davekoelmeyer.co.nz> wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > Apologies if this change has already been made, but if not, what are > > folks' thoughts about enabling Haddock as the default template for new > > JSPWiki installations? The plain vanilla template is pretty long in the > > tooth and certainly doesn't relay a good first impression out of the box. > > > > Cheers, > > Dave > > > > -- > > Dave Koelmeyer > > http://blog.davekoelmeyer.co.nz > > GPG Key ID: 0x238BFF87 > > > > >
