Agree. I would be sensible to push out a release; to stabilise the template upgrade.
dirk On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 5:53 PM Harry Metske <harry.met...@gmail.com> wrote: > JP, > > that would be fine I think. > > tx, > Harry > > > Op zo 17 feb. 2019 om 23:58 schreef Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez < > juanpablo.san...@gmail.com> > > > Hi, > > > > we've been some releases trying to adhere to a release train strategy, > with > > stops each quarter. Q4-2018 release had issues, so we > > ended up releasing it on Jan, 29th, 2019. Given that, I felt that > probably > > made sense to skip February stop. > > > > However, given that there are a couple of fixes regarding the rename of > the > > haddock template to default, a new Dark appereance > > mode for Haddock, enabled by default, and a few other fixes and > > improvements, I think releasing 2.11.0.M2 on February would make > > most sense. I'd only like to extract the util package to its own > submodule, > > which should be fairly easy, but other than that, that would > > be for me if we release on Feb. > > > > WDYT? > > > > > > br, > > juan pablo > > >
