Stuff I'd like to add to that list:
Expand JSPWiki markup:
* [JSPWIKI-1100] Add support for mixed css-class & css-style markup
* [JSPWIKI-1040] Add new markup %%% ... /% for plain-text sections
Rendering engine:
* [JSPWIKI-1101] Change rendering of {{{inline preformatted text}}} using a
css class in stead of a hardcoded style
* [JSPWIKI-932] [JSPWIKI-930] Stop rendering mixed text-nodes & elements to
ensure consistent styling of content.
To be discussed
Support for charts, math
* [JSPWIKI-1102] Add charting library to JSPWiki distribution
* [JSPWIKI-1103] Add MATH library to JSPWiki distribution
Privacy
* [JSPWIKI-1104] Add %%alert-with-cookie; to support privacy-alert messages
Haddock Template / Not sure if feasible still for 2.11.0:
* [JSPWIKI-1099] User-Pref UI redesign.
* [JSPWIKI-1098] Make the switch from Icon Fonts to SVG
Build:
* [JSPWIKI-1097] Gradually replace mootools js library by native js/css3
* To be investigated: replace wrox by a nodejs based solution to
build/minify the LESS-CSS/JS.
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 9:28 PM Juan Pablo Santos RodrÃguez <
juanpablo.san...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> below is a list of things I'd like to get before reaching 2.11.0:
> * switch log4j to log4j2 - log4j would still be loaded if present on
> classpath, in order to ease transition for 3rd party plugins and filters.
> There's a jira issue about having a logging facade, this would be it
> (2.11.0.M3)
> * remove all deprecated code (2.11.0.M3)
> * move the (un?)official docker image into the source repository
> (2.11.0.M3/2.11.0)
> * make workflows persistent between restarts. There's a jira issue about
> making workflows serializable, this would be it (2.11.0)
> * ability to use the markdown provider. I'd need help with this one on the
> front side, being looking at it the ast few days and there's a lot at the
> front, I don't even know where to start looking.. (2.11.0)
> * extract more submodules where possible (2.11.0.M3 / 2.11.0)
> * ??
>
> Why no more M# after M3? After M3 we would have quite some changes, so I
> think is enough.. 2.11.0 technically would still acomodate breaking
> changes, but we could have more M# if needed M3 and then 2.11.0 is only
> what I'm thinking right now..
>
> sounds reasonable? is there anything else anyone would want before 2.11.0?
>
>
> best regards,
> juan pablo
>
