+1 from me as well if I have the right to vote ☺ On Sun, 5 Feb 2017 20:26 Steve Viens, <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 from me as well. > > Steve Viens > [email protected] > 603-828-2397 > > On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Kurt T Stam <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 from me. --Kurt > > On 2/5/17 8:30 AM, Alex O'Ree wrote: > > Sorry, the last email had the incorrect subject line! > > > Dear jUDDI enthusiasts, > > The new release is here! This release is primarily bug fixes. > > The release distribution is temporarily available here > https://www.dropbox.com/sh/bt7jes1jzl94qh1/AACh43p7QIfu5hyCb9gut6_Ka?dl=0 > > The release artifacts are staged in nexus: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejuddi-1009/ > > and we have a tag at: > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/juddi.git/?p=juddi.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/juddi-3.3.4 > > > Small change set this time. 1 bug fix and the rest were pom updates. > Testing on non default tomcat/cxf/debry containers is appreciated. > > > Please give it a spin and cast your vote. This vote will be open for > the next 72 hours per the release policy, which is: > - the vote will be closed as soon as 6 hours have past and >7 +1 > votes are received with no -1 vote being cast, or > - if after 12h >5 +1 votes have been cast with no -1 vote, or > - if after 24h if 3 +1 votes have been cast with no -1 vote, or failing > that > - after 72h provided at least 3 +1 votes have been cast and there is > a majority of +1 votes from the cast votes. > > > +1 > > Bug > > [JUDDI-967] - Suspicious incrementers in for loops > [JUDDI-968] - Update pom dependencies for vulnerable libraries > > > > >
