We have fixed this issue in 0.8. Withreplication factor 1, if the producer doesn't care about partitioning by key, messages will be sent to partitions that are currently available.
Thanks, Jun On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Michal Haris <michal.ha...@visualdna.com>wrote: > Same here, summary was need as we have a fairly large ecosystem of multiple > 0.7.2 clusters and I am planning to test upgrade to 0.8. > However, one thing creeping at the back of my mind regarding 0.8 is > something i have spotted in one thread few weeks ago namely that the > rebalance behaviour of producers is not as robust as in 0.7.x without > replication and i remeber there was no designed solution at the time - any > news here ? Basically our usecase doesn't require replication but logical > offsets and some other things introduced would solve some problems. > On Feb 7, 2013 7:11 PM, "Vaibhav Puranik" <vpura...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Same here. Thanks a lot Jun. > > > > Regards, > > Vaibhav > > > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Felix GV <fe...@mate1inc.com> wrote: > > > > > Thanks Jun! > > > > > > I hadn't been following the discussions regarding 0.8 and replication > > for a > > > little while and this was a great post to refresh my memory and get up > to > > > speed on the current replication architecture's design. > > > > > > -- > > > Felix > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Jun Rao <jun...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > I just posted the following blog on Kafka replication. This may > answer > > > some > > > > of the questions that a few people have asked in the mailing list > > before. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://engineering.linkedin.com/kafka/intra-cluster-replication-apache-kafka > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Jun > > > > > > > > > >
