I uploaded a patch against trunk which also fixes KAFKA-1036, the other knows windows issue. Review appreciated. Should be an easy one.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1008 -Jay On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Jun Rao <jun...@gmail.com> wrote: > KAFKA-1008 has been checked into the 0.8 branch and needs to be manually > double-committed to trunk. To avoid merging problems, I suggest that for > all future changes in the 0.8 branch, we double commit them to trunk. Any > objections? > > Thanks, > > Jun > > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Jun Rao <jun...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, Everyone, > > > > I made another pass of the remaining jiras that we plan to fix in the 0.8 > > final release. > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-954?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.8%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22) > > > > Do people agree with this list? > > > > Joe, > > > > I don't have good understanding of KAFKA-1018. Do you think this needs to > > be fixed in 0.8 final? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jun > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Jun Rao <jun...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi, Everyone, > >> > >> We have been stabilizing the 0.8 branch since the beta1 release. I think > >> we are getting close to an 0.8 final release. I made an initial list of > the > >> remaining jiras that should be fixed in 0.8. > >> > >> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.8%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22) > >> > >> 1. Do people agree with the list? > >> > >> 2. If the list is good, could people help contributing/reviewing the > >> remaining jiras? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Jun > >> > > > > >
