The (2)'s have it. I will put up a patch using this approach. -Jay
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 on 2 > > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Jay Kreps <jay.kr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hey all, > > > > There was several previous discussions on metrics for the new clients but > > I'm not sure had a unanimous consensus on the best approach. I'd put > > forward the following options: > > 1. Plain vanilla JMX (no one actually wanted this, but for > completeness...) > > 2. Improve on custom metrics package current on trunk > > 3. Coda Hale package > > > > There are of course many other possibilities, but we didn't get a > concrete > > alternative so let's just vote on these and do one of them so we can keep > > making progress. > > > > For my part I am +1 for (2). I agree it is a bit of NIH, but I think the > > advantages of the new code combined with the advantages of a no-deps > client > > are worth it. > > > > -Jay > > > > > > -- > -- Guozhang >
