Thanks Matthias. With that, I can close this vote. The total is +4 with 3 binding votes.
-Jason On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 3:52 PM Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On 4/10/19 12:17 AM, Magnus Edenhill wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > Den ons 10 apr. 2019 kl 02:38 skrev Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>: > > > >> +1 (binding). Thanks for the written KIP! The approach lgtm. > >> > >> One minor thing: the name of "last epoch" maybe a bit misleading > (although > >> it is for internal usage only and will not be exposed to users) for > future > >> developers, how about rename it to "required_epoch" and if it is set to > >> "-1" it means "not required, hence not checks"? > >> > >> Guozhang > >> > >> On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 5:02 PM Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> > wrote: > >> > >>> Bump (for Guozhang) > >>> > >>> On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 8:55 AM Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi All, > >>>> > >>>> I'd like to start a vote on KIP-360: > >>>> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-360%3A+Improve+handling+of+unknown+producer > >>>> . > >>>> > >>>> +1 from me (duh) > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Jason > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> -- Guozhang > >> > > > >
