Hi Jason, Thanks for your feedback. You have brought a good point. I did not consider this but your are right. It makes sense to add it as well in order to able to fully parse the SyncGroup request/response. Let me update the KIP.
Thanks, David On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 12:52 PM Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> wrote: > Hi David, > > Just one question. In addition to including the protocol type, I'm > wondering if there is value in adding the protocol name to SyncGroup? This > would potentially give you the ability to parse the "user data" field in > the consumer group schema. > > Thanks, > Jason > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 9:35 AM David Jacot <dja...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I would like to start a vote on KIP-559: Make the Kafka Protocol > Friendlier > > with L7 Proxies. > > > > The KIP is here: > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-559%3A+Make+the+Kafka+Protocol+Friendlier+with+L7+Proxies > > > > Thanks, > > David > > >
