Hi Sophie, I cannot find the attachment from your previous email --- in fact, ASF mailing list usually blocks all attachments for security reasons. If you can share a link to the image (google drawings etc) in your email that would be great.
Guozhang On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 1:02 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <sop...@confluent.io> wrote: > Just to throw another proposal out there and inspire some debate, here's a > similar-but-different > idea (inspired by John + some sketches I found on google): > > *~~ See attachment, inlined image is too large for the mailing list ~~* > > This one's definitely more fun, my only concern is that it doesn't really > scale well. At the lower end > of sizes the otters will be pretty difficult to see; and I had to stretch > out the Kafka circles even at > the larger end just to fit them through. > > But maybe with a cleaner drawing and some color it'll still look good and > be recognizable + distinct > enough when small. > > Any thoughts? Any binding and/or non-binding votes? > > On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 1:00 AM Sophie Blee-Goldman <sop...@confluent.io> > wrote: > >> Seems the mailing list may have filtered the inlined prototype logo, >> attaching it here instead >> >> On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 11:54 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <sop...@confluent.io> >> wrote: >> >>> Matthias makes a good point about being careful not to position Streams >>> as >>> outside of Apache Kafka. One obvious thing we could do it just include >>> the >>> Kafka logo as-is in the Streams logo, somehow. >>> >>> I have some unqualified opinions on what that might look like: >>> A good logo is simple and clean, so incorporating the Kafka logo as a >>> minor >>> detail within a more complicated image is probably not the best way to >>> get >>> the quick and easy comprehension/recognition that we're going for. >>> >>> That said I'd throw out the idea of just attaching something to the >>> Kafka logo, >>> perhaps a stream-dwelling animal, perhaps a (river) otter? It could be >>> "swimming" left of the Kafka logo, with its head touching the upper >>> circle and >>> its tail touching the bottom one. Like Streams, it starts with Kafka and >>> ends >>> with Kafka (ie reading input topics and writing to output topics). >>> >>> Without further ado, here's my very rough prototype for the Kafka >>> Streams logo: >>> >>> [image: image.png] >>> Obviously the real thing would be colored and presumably done by someone >>> with actual artist talent/experience (or at least photoshop ability). >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> On Sat, Mar 7, 2020, 1:08 PM Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>> Hash: SHA512 >>>> >>>> Boyang, >>>> >>>> thanks for starting this discussion. I like the idea in general >>>> however we need to be a little careful IMHO -- as you mentioned Kafka >>>> is one project and thus we should avoid the impression that Kafka >>>> Streams is not part of Apache Kafka. >>>> >>>> Besides this, many projects use animals that are often very adorable. >>>> Maybe we could find a cute Streams related mascot? :) >>>> >>>> I would love to hear opinions especially from the PMC if having a logo >>>> for Kafka Streams is a viable thing to do. >>>> >>>> >>>> - -Matthias >>>> >>>> On 3/3/20 1:01 AM, Patrik Kleindl wrote: >>>> > Hi Boyang Great idea, that would help in some discussions. To throw >>>> > in a first idea: https://imgur.com/a/UowXaMk best regards Patrik >>>> > >>>> > On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 at 18:23, Boyang Chen >>>> > <reluctanthero...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> Hey Apache Kafka committers and community folks, >>>> >> >>>> >> over the years Kafka Streams has been widely adopted and tons of >>>> >> blog posts and tech talks have been trying to introduce it to >>>> >> people with need of stream processing. As it is part of Apache >>>> >> Kafka project, there is always an awkward situation where Kafka >>>> >> Streams could not be campaigned as a standalone streaming engine, >>>> >> and makes people confused about its relation to Kafka. >>>> >> >>>> >> So, do we want to introduce a customized logo just for Streams? >>>> >> The immediate benefit is when people are making technical >>>> >> decisions, we could list Streams as a logo just like Flink and >>>> >> Spark Streaming, instead of putting Kafka logo there as it is not >>>> >> literally a legitimate comparison between processing framework >>>> >> and messaging system. Should we do a KIP for this? >>>> >> >>>> >> Boyang >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>>> >>>> iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEI8mthP+5zxXZZdDSO4miYXKq/OgFAl5kDVQACgkQO4miYXKq >>>> /Og2Hg/+IOjjz3yrvHOz/p/Qbi9hXDK+GZT6Ixzk2HrrpMiLAAZs6WrNGQMwwI6a >>>> qrPdMRLKA45F53wwMXBqhLYe0O0vOIRSur3pef8UuTVEkbFstY6dNzduPjTXK4vV >>>> Ahzb+pu1lZsF+n2DbMuXWvkmvMAsSrKQXbH58rA7I4qx7Zr6g1a/KL2b2oOoo3kI >>>> 4x3PJfG6oLSnQHwkJxmM79ZjM7MLZh0d8cRqb7Oudy5MJiMzHY+Rm5aTu4nhPgRr >>>> cLxA8kz1PbGPboxjD9/ZGuZJMWfVnvY1wJcOp5UnOUs4kX5uYDyWw1sKIn3DcnW8 >>>> YVzoto0syCHTAdbl89H2fxhJbtVp8JSxbBx9AW8mdgLOLsYRZGHZ1cbdJ3h4NkeE >>>> xTPTuTptQbhdcjbSVX6F0q+h1hiPCU5PKqcR12zGVTBI4rOGkhPIhDdnIti5Qp2e >>>> MQ1Urh/tWCfwiJZbOyjZ9Tz/2vbUBB4kzUI9DxwWpD15jgMuN3JfqFwcwSIm7NrY >>>> jHcM3UB2QlUt+uymU78xjy6er2AFiGrfL7UXeFHzzVIWBU3fdw4wqpuIuWjFhL3t >>>> NWnAvamXOc7kfE4VXQ8igoRUVDZ8xCCqNvVoaJZ1cWboY/Cfk+4sgd9QnDMZN9jU >>>> bzRpghQp3R93Vp5FH4L9z478uuh8DFM2/+6pqqapd9efydGtKrU= >>>> =OFBs >>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>>> >>> -- -- Guozhang
