Yeah, I will renew my +1 as well in light of the new discussion.  Thanks.

Colin

On Fri, Mar 27, 2020, at 11:22, Kamal Chandraprakash wrote:
> +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP!
> 
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 9:16 PM Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote:
> 
> > Vote is still good. We can always add things later if needed.
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020, 8:15 AM Aneel Nazareth <an...@confluent.io> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Colin and Gwen,
> > >
> > > I wanted to double-check that your +1 votes were still good, since the
> > > proposal has been simplified (removing the --delete-config-file option
> > > and taking out the support for reading from STDIN).
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 10:01 AM Rajini Sivaram <rajinisiva...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1 (binding)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the KIP, Aneel!
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Rajini
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 5:06 AM Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (binding), thank you
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2020, 2:26 PM Colin McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (binding).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks, Aneel.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > best,
> > > > > > Colin
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2020, at 00:04, David Jacot wrote:
> > > > > > > +1 (non-binding), thanks for the KIP!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > David
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 4:06 PM Aneel Nazareth <
> > an...@confluent.io
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hello all,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks to the folks who have given feedback. I've incorporated
> > > the
> > > > > > > > suggestions, and think that this is now ready for a vote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-574%3A+CLI+Dynamic+Configuration+with+file+input
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thank you,
> > > > > > > > Aneel
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to