Btw: I think the KIP is quite straightforward and you could even skip the DISCUSS and call for a VOTE directly.
-Matthias On 6/4/20 4:40 PM, Matthias J. Sax wrote: > @Chia-Ping > > Can you maybe start a new DISCUSS thread using the new KIP number? This > would help to keep the threads separated. > > Thanks! > > > -Matthias > > On 6/3/20 6:56 AM, Chia-Ping Tsai wrote: >> When I created the KIP, the next number was 619 and not sure why the number >> is out of sync. >> >> At any rate, I will update the KIP number :_ >> >> On 2020/06/03 05:06:39, Cheng Tan <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi Chia, >>> >>> Hope you are doing well. I already took KIP-619 as my KIP identification >>> number. Could you change your KIP id? Thank you. >>> >>> Best, - Cheng >>> >>>> On May 31, 2020, at 8:08 PM, Chia-Ping Tsai <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> hi All, >>>> >>>> This KIP plans to deprecate two unused methods without replacement. >>>> >>>> All suggestions are welcome! >>>> >>>> KIP: >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=155749118 >>>> ISSUE: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10044 >>>> >>>> --- >>>> Chia-Ping >>> >>> >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
