Hi Badai,

Thanks for the KIP. I think that it is a nice improvement so I am +1
(non-binding).

Long term, I wonder if we could adopt a formatting system similar to
kafkacat. It
would reduce the number of properties that one has to set and also allow
more
powerful formatting. That could be done as a new formatter for instance.

Example:
kafkacat -b mybroker -t syslog -f 'Topic %t[%p], offset: %o, key: %k,
payload: %S bytes: %s\n'

Best,
David

On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 12:30 PM Manikumar <manikumar.re...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks for the KIP.
>
> Thanks,
> Manikumar
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 11:47 AM Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> > On 7/7/20 7:16 PM, John Roesler wrote:
> > > Hi Badai,
> > >
> > > Thanks for picking this up. I've reviewed the KIP document and
> > > the threads you linked. I think we may want to make more
> > > improvements in the future to the printing of headers in particular,
> > > but this KIP seems like a clear benefit already. I think we can
> > > take it incrementally.
> > >
> > > I'm +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > -John
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2020, at 09:57, Badai Aqrandista wrote:
> > >> Hi all
> > >>
> > >> After resurrecting the discussion thread [1] for KIP-431 and have not
> > >> received any further feedback for 2 weeks, I would like to resurrect
> > >> the voting thread [2] for KIP-431.
> > >>
> > >> I have updated KIP-431 wiki page
> > >> (
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-431%3A+Support+of+printing+additional+ConsumerRecord+fields+in+DefaultMessageFormatter
> > )
> > >> to address Ismael's comment on that thread [3].
> > >>
> > >> Does anyone else have other comments or objections about this KIP?
> > >>
> > >> [1]
> > >>
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/raabf3268ed05931b8a048fce0d6cdf6a326aee4b0d89713d6e6998d6%40%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
> > >>
> > >> [2]
> > >>
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/41fff34873184625370f9e76b8d9257f7a9e7892ab616afe64b4f67c%40%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
> > >>
> > >> [3]
> > >>
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/99e9cbaad4a0a49b96db104de450c9f488d4b2b03a09b991bcbadbc7%40%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Badai
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to