Hello Bruno, Thanks for the KIP, it sounds good to me as well. Just a minor comment: we would include which package the new "MissingSourceTopicException" class belongs to.
Guozhang On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 11:53 AM John Roesler <vvcep...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks for the KIP, Bruno! > > Your proposal sounds good to me. > > -John > > On Fri, 2020-08-21 at 11:18 -0700, Sophie Blee-Goldman > wrote: > > Thanks for the KIP! I'm totally in favor of this approach and to be > honest, > > have > > always wondered why we just silently shut down instead of throwing an > > exception. > > This has definitely been a source of confusion for users in my personal > > experience. > > > > I was originally hesitant to extend StreamsException since I always > thought > > that anything > > extending from KafkaException was supposed to "indicate Streams internal > > errors" > > -- a phrase I'm quoting from Streams logs directly -- but I now see that > > we're actually > > somewhat inconsistent here. Perhaps "Streams internal errors" does not in > > fact mean > > internal to Streams itself but just any error that occurs during Stream > > processing? > > > > Anyways, I'm looking forward to cleaning up the exception hierarchy so we > > get a clear > > division of user vs "internal" error, but within the current framework > this > > SGTM > > > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 8:06 AM Bruno Cadonna <br...@confluent.io> > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I would like to propose the following KIP: > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-662%3A+Throw+Exception+when+Source+Topics+of+a+Streams+App+are+Deleted > > > > > > Best, > > > Bruno > > > > > -- -- Guozhang
