Thanks Ron. Makes sense. I'll pitch the idea of writing this KIP to my team.
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 11:01 PM Ron Dagostino <rndg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Gokul. This would require a KIP to discuss. If you have a compelling > need to change this then I encourage you to create a KIP and start the > discussion. I’m not aware of anything specific that would prevent the > change, but I will say that my gut instinct says it wouldn’t be a good idea > without a truly compelling justification. > > Ron > > > On Sep 28, 2020, at 8:34 AM, Gokul Ramanan Subramanian < > gokul24...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Thanks Ron. > > > > Does this mean that it would be safe to remove the "KafkaPrincipal has > not > > changed after reauth" check in a future version? Or do you think there > are > > portions of the code that work under the assumption that this check > exists? > > > >> On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 12:07 AM Ron Dagostino <rndg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> Hi Gokul. I looked back at the discussion thread, and it appears it > was an > >> arbitrary decision. > >> > >> > >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/45c09f226386c0b1dc5f9b36e112882a20414d5900f8d778969e633e%40%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E > >> > >> Ron > >> > >> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 11:03 AM Gokul Ramanan Subramanian < > >> gokul24...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi. > >>> > >>> I was looking through Kafka code and found that SASL KafkaPrincipals > are > >>> not supposed to change upon reauthentication, and if they do, the > broker > >>> will kill the TCP connection. > >>> > >>> What is the reasoning behind this limitation? > >>> > >>> Thanks. > >>> > >> >
