Thanks everyone for the votes. KIP-630 has been accepted.

Binding: Guozhang, Jason and Jun
Non-binding: Ron and Lucas

On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 4:33 PM Jose Garcia Sancio <jsan...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the votes Jun, Jason, Ron, Lucas and Guozhang.
>
> Thanks for the feedback Ron and Jun.
>
> Agree with your comments Ron. I have updated those configurations to
> metadata.snapshot.min.changed_records.ratio and
> metadata.snapshot.min.new_records.size. I thought of using "clenable"
> to keep it consistent with the configuration of compaction policy.
> Snapshots are different enough that that consistency is not needed.
>
> Jun, I missed the incorrect mention of OFFSET_OUT_OF_RANGE. I have
> replaced it with POSITION_OUT_OF_RANGE.
>
> Changes to the KIP are here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/diffpagesbyversion.action?pageId=158864763&selectedPageVersions=39&selectedPageVersions=37
>
> I believe that we have enough votes to accept this KIP. I'll close the
> voting on Monday.
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 2:04 PM Jun Rao <j...@confluent.io> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Jose,
> >
> > Thanks for the KIP. +1. A couple of minor comments below.
> >
> > 1. The new configuration names suggested by Ron sound reasonable.
> > 2. It seems that OFFSET_OUT_OF_RANGE in the wiki needs to be changed to
> > POSITION_OUT_OF_RANGE.
> >
> > Jun
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 9:46 AM Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 Thanks for the KIP!
> > >
> > > -Jason
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 9:03 AM Ron Dagostino <rndg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for the KIP, Jose.  +1 (non-binding) from me.
> > > >
> > > > I do have one comment/confusion.
> > > >
> > > > Upon re-reading the latest version, I am confused about the name of
> > > > the proposed "metadata.snapshot.min.records" config.  Is this a size,
> > > > or is it a count?  I think it is about a size but want to be sure.  I
> > > > also wonder if it is about changes (updates/deletes) rather than just
> > > > additions/accretions, or is it independent of that?
> > > >
> > > > I'm also unclear about the definition of the
> > > > "metadata.snapshot.min.cleanable.ratio" config -- is that a ratio of a
> > > > *number* of new records to the number of snapshot records?  Or is it a
> > > > *size* ratio?  I think it is a ratio of numbers of records rather than
> > > > a ratio of sizes.  I think this one is also about changes
> > > > (updates/deletes) rather than just additions/accretions.
> > > >
> > > > I'm wondering if we can be clearer with the names of these two configs
> > > > to make their definitions more apparent.  For example, assuming
> > > > certain definitions as mentioned above:
> > > >
> > > > metadata.snapshot.min.new_records.size -- the minimum size of new
> > > > records required before a snapshot can occur
> > > > metadata.snapshot.min.change_records.ratio -- the minimum ratio of the
> > > > number of change (i.e. not simply accretion) records to the number of
> > > > records in the last snapshot (if any) that must be achieved before a
> > > > snapshot can occur.
> > > >
> > > > For example, if there is no snapshot yet, then ".new_records.size"
> > > > must be written before a snapshot is allowed.  If there is a snapshot
> > > > with N records, then before a snapshot is allowed both
> > > > ".new_records.size" must be written and ".change_records.ratio" must
> > > > be satisfied such that the number of changes (not accretions) divided
> > > > by N meets the ratio.
> > > >
> > > > Ron
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 8:14 PM Lucas Bradstreet <lu...@confluent.io>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for the KIP! Non-binding +1
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 3:30 PM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks Jose! +1 from me.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 3:18 PM Jose Garcia Sancio <
> > > > jsan...@confluent.io>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I would like to start a vote on KIP-630.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > KIP: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/exV4CQ
> > > > > > > Discussion Thread:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r9468d1f276385695a2d6d48f6dfbdc504c445fc5745aaa606d138fed%40%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thank you
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > -Jose
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > -- Guozhang
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
>
>
> --
> -Jose



-- 
-Jose

Reply via email to