A. Sophie Blee-Goldman created KAFKA-12559:
----------------------------------------------
Summary: Add a top-level Streams config for bounding off-heap
memory
Key: KAFKA-12559
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12559
Project: Kafka
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: streams
Reporter: A. Sophie Blee-Goldman
At the moment we provide an example of how to bound the memory usage of rocskdb
in the [Memory
Management|https://kafka.apache.org/27/documentation/streams/developer-guide/memory-mgmt.html#rocksdb]
section of the docs. This requires implementing a custom RocksDBConfigSetter
class and setting a number of rocksdb options for relatively advanced concepts
and configurations. It seems a fair number of users either fail to find this or
consider it to be for more advanced use cases/users. But RocksDB can eat up a
lot of off-heap memory and it's not uncommon for users to come across a
{{RocksDBException: Cannot allocate memory}}
It would probably be a much better user experience if we implemented this
memory bound out-of-the-box and just gave users a top-level StreamsConfig to
tune the off-heap memory given to rocksdb, like we have for on-heap cache
memory with cache.max.bytes.buffering. More advanced users can continue to
fine-tune their memory bounding and apply other configs with a custom config
setter, while new or more casual users can cap on the off-heap memory without
getting their hands dirty with rocksdb.
I would propose to add the following top-level config:
rocksdb.max.bytes.off.heap: medium priority, default to -1 (unbounded), valid
values are [0, inf]
I'd also want to consider adding a second, lower priority top-level config to
give users a knob for adjusting how much of that total off-heap memory goes to
the block cache + index/filter blocks, and how much of it is afforded to the
write buffers. I'm struggling to come up with a good name for this config, but
it would be something like
rocksdb.memtable.to.block.cache.off.heap.memory.ratio: low priority, default to
0.5, valid values are [0, 1]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)