Good morning,

Bringing this back to the top.

We currently have

1 binding
4 non-binding

Knowles

On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 10:02 AM Knowles Atchison Jr <katchiso...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thank you all for voting. We still need two more binding votes.
>
> I have rebased and updated the PR to be ready to go once this vote passes:
>
> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11382
>
> Knowles
>
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 3:43 PM Chris Egerton <chr...@confluent.io.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding). Thanks Knowles!
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 10:48 AM Arjun Satish <arjun.sat...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP, Knowles! and appreciate the
>> > follow-ups!
>> >
>> > On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 2:55 PM John Roesler <vvcep...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Thanks, Knowles!
>> > >
>> > > I'm +1 (binding)
>> > >
>> > > -John
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, 2021-11-10 at 12:42 -0500, Christopher Shannon
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > +1 (non-binding). This looks good to me and will be useful as a way
>> to
>> > > > handle producer errors.
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 8:55 AM Knowles Atchison Jr <
>> > > katchiso...@gmail.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Good morning,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I'd like to start a vote for KIP-779: Allow Source Tasks to Handle
>> > > Producer
>> > > > > Exceptions:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-779%3A+Allow+Source+Tasks+to+Handle+Producer+Exceptions
>> > > > >
>> > > > > The purpose of this KIP is to allow Source Tasks the option to
>> > "ignore"
>> > > > > kafka producer exceptions. After a few iterations, this is now
>> part
>> > of
>> > > the
>> > > > > "errors.tolerance" configuration and provides a null
>> RecordMetadata
>> > to
>> > > > > commitRecord() in lieu of a new SourceTask interface method or
>> worker
>> > > > > configuration item.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > PR is here:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11382
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Any comments and feedback are welcome.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Knowles
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to