Hi Mason, Thanks for the KIP. I had a few questions. Are you saying that we will be keeping the original (untagged) offline partitions count metric? I was a little confused by the wording in the KIP>
I'm also curious about potential performance impacts. Have you looked into this? Thanks, Justine On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 10:00 AM Mason Legere <mason.leg...@salesforce.com.invalid> wrote: > Hey, > > Planning to open a vote for this small change tomorrow - haven't heard > anything yet but open to any feedback. > > Best, > Mason > > On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 1:54 PM Mason Legere <mason.leg...@salesforce.com> > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > I would like to start a discussion for KIP-804 > > < > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-804%3A+OfflinePartitionsCount+Tagged+by+Topic>, > which > > proposes tagging the offline partition counter metric (managed by the > > controller) by the topic name of the corresponding offline partition(s). > > > > Open to any thoughts and suggestions, > > Mason > > >
