[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14060413#comment-14060413
 ] 

Joe Stein commented on KAFKA-1539:
----------------------------------

Did you have the log.flush.interval.messages == 1 when doing this?  If not then 
you can either do something like that and sacrifice performance and futz with a 
single broker flush or have (instead) replicas/brokers outside of zones that 
are sharing power grids for a partition you are working with.  Use replication 
to achieve your durability with less sacrifice to performance using more than 
one broker. If you need/want something within a single broker there are lots of 
toggle to use in the broker configuration 
https://kafka.apache.org/documentation.html#brokerconfigs. 

> Due to OS caching Kafka might loose offset files which causes full reset of 
> data
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-1539
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1539
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: log
>    Affects Versions: 0.8.1.1
>            Reporter: Dmitry Bugaychenko
>            Assignee: Jay Kreps
>
> Seen this while testing power failure and disk failures. Due to chaching on 
> OS level (eg. XFS can cache data for 30 seconds) after failure we got offset 
> files of zero length. This dramatically slows down broker startup (it have to 
> re-check all segments) and if high watermark offsets lost it simply erases 
> all data and start recovering from other brokers (looks funny - first 
> spending 2-3 hours re-checking logs and then deleting them all due to missing 
> high watermark).
> Proposal: introduce offset files rotation. Keep two version of offset file, 
> write to oldest, read from the newest valid. In this case we would be able to 
> configure offset checkpoint time in a way that at least one file is alway 
> flushed and valid.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to